|
Post by Polina on May 8, 2008 18:14:26 GMT -1
I've found a stash of archive articles on the internet, to which I am going to put links in the Articles page on the site - and then organise them in roughly chronological order (largely so that when I'm half awake I don't think Excellent, another series of Restoration and then become thoroughly badtempered when I realise it was written in 2004).
I've put two up at the moment, including a rather lovely feature interview from the Sunday Times magazine. Enjoy.
|
|
|
Post by Polina on May 9, 2008 18:18:23 GMT -1
I've now reorganised them in (I think) a better way - they're in date order starting with the most recent. This means that at the moment the "new" archive ones will be in their correct chronological place, but I'll try to find some way of making them more visible....
The idea is that new (and hopefully more relevant) ones will go to the top of the list. Eesh.
|
|
|
Post by Polina on May 11, 2008 19:15:13 GMT -1
Right (although I'm talking to myself, I hope this is of some help....)
I've reorganised the articles page - probably merely for the nth time out of n to the power of eternity, but I hope it works. Everything is now in reverse chronological order, and all the new ones are bulleted and will stay that way for a week after being put up (the idea being that you can check to see what's new since last time you looked....). Is a week long enough? Hmm.
Let me know if this works!
|
|
|
Post by Lady Jacqueline on May 13, 2008 12:54:00 GMT -1
Talk to yourself no longer dear, for I am here. Looks good, well ordered.
As for the question, is a week long enough? should be, how does two weeks sound, gives that little extra just for real busy people or folk that don't get much online time? What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by Polina on May 13, 2008 13:54:29 GMT -1
Absolutely fine - will leave them spotty for a fortnight. I just didn't want it to get too confusing... Now that I have done the major trawl of the dailies for stuff I'm hoping that there won't ever be quite such a huge quantity to add at one time!
BTW (and I never thought I'd say this) I commend to your attention the Daily Mail article in the about section. About four years old but very entertaining!
|
|
|
Post by Lady Jacqueline on May 13, 2008 14:05:57 GMT -1
Just reading it now, got to this bit And read orgasm what sort of numpty am I?
|
|
|
Post by Polina on May 13, 2008 14:08:03 GMT -1
Oh REALLY, ladyj!
Hello, that's the wrong one, because I've cocked up the link. Give me five and then try again....
|
|
|
Post by Lady Jacqueline on May 13, 2008 14:10:31 GMT -1
Oh I love it, very entertaining, and very on top of current events.
|
|
|
Post by Polina on May 13, 2008 14:18:08 GMT -1
It's the right one now!
|
|
|
Post by Lady Jacqueline on May 13, 2008 17:02:52 GMT -1
OK, I believe I've just read the right one, at the very beginning, the woman comments on his good looks? yes.
|
|
|
Post by Polina on May 13, 2008 17:04:59 GMT -1
Yes, that's the one. Sensible wench!
The prize STILL goes to the wench from The Resident though - the charm obviously worked in a major way there!
|
|
|
Post by Lady Jacqueline on May 13, 2008 17:45:18 GMT -1
Yep, very smart woman, good taste and all that.
|
|
Vixen
Weekend Hippy
Don?t let your victories go to your head, or your failures go to your heart
Posts: 227
|
Post by Vixen on May 28, 2008 8:14:01 GMT -1
Just reading it now, got to this bit And read orgasm what sort of numpty am I? The kind that fell out of the same tree as me, for I read it the same
|
|
|
Post by Polina on May 28, 2008 9:23:22 GMT -1
You're all weird. ;D
|
|
Vixen
Weekend Hippy
Don?t let your victories go to your head, or your failures go to your heart
Posts: 227
|
Post by Vixen on May 28, 2008 10:04:14 GMT -1
Nice to feel loved Pol
|
|